CONNECTING THE NODES

Observations on Electronic Harassment Created through Standard Radio Based Scanner Broadcasts

Under construction—draft 2

January 24, 2014 first entry

Disclaimer:  I understand the basic issues of the human mind, and the fluctuating control of the Id, Ego, and  Super-ego.  The Id represents the unorganized instincts and drives.  The Ego functions on ‘the reality principle’ which satisfies desire in a realistic paced and longer term pathways versus choices that will bring short-term grief.  The Super-ego guides towards perfection through guidance and socially appropriate focus. [see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Id,_ego_and_super-ego ]  So some mud-slinging smarty pants MAY try to argue that as a defense mechanism, when one of these three components seeks to control the brain, IT MAY BECOME SO STRONG AS TO AUDIBLY PRODUCE SIGNALS TO REINFORCE THE NEEDS AND DRIVES INNATELY CONTAINED IN ITS STRUCTURE.  In other words, putting a microphone to an artificial voice given to a particular part of the consciousness, and a speaker placed in the ears so has to over-ride the brain’s reasoning structure.  This synthetic strength would bypass thought processes, and manifest in human abnormal behavior.  This phenomenon described might be labeled as psychosis or multiple personality disorder.  However, the proliferation of electronic signal saturation, and plain dirty trick playing harassing individuals, may seek to create a false diagnosis by employing undefined or unsuccessfully prosecuted technologies and techniques.  Perhaps some people’s brains are more susceptible to penetrating radiation, some may be just plain targeted. [see microwave auditory frequency, wiki; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_auditory_effect  ]

Gary Sklaver is the attorney that told me, in Attorney Fretel’s office, ‘you can’t stop us…’  Around that time, interfering but audible sound bites and streams started to blend in to my television and radio broadcasts.  I am postulating that these interfering signals are two-way conversations that are similar to the systems that are used by municipal agencies to communicate with each other or some high frequency signal designed for the same purpose .   These conversations seem to place my speakers in the middle, and become decoded by use of a simple signal scanner or ham radio setup.   I performed this step by using a free online scanner, scrolling through the channels, and finding where the blended sound-bites match what are emanating over other non-networked but powered speakers attached to other broadcast medium, connected to unrelated media streams…

This phenomenon seems to match another case Attorney Sklaver was involved in, where not his client, but his opposition faced some sort of similar harassing tactics.  This gentleman later was discredited, signed over his business ownership, and then is quoted of feeling ‘other’ forms of non-traditional manifestations of terror.

As author Molly Ball wrote in her piece ‘A Grab for the Wheel…’ in the Yale Herald Online,

Spoerndle signed over control of the club—he claims he was told the agreement was temporary. Now, thanks to a 12-step program, he says he’s been sober for over two years, but he’s still locked out of Toad’s. In May, he filed a civil suit in New Haven Superior Court, claiming Phelps took advantage of his debased condition and fraudulently induced him to give up his property.

“At that time, I was totally out of my mind. I mean, I was in and out of eight or 10 psych wards. The aliens were at my house, I thought,” Spoerndle says. “And, you know, people sometimes take advantage of people who are out of their minds. But there are laws that protect people.” Spoerndle hopes that those laws will eventually put Toad’s back in his hands.

“I’m not the hotshot I used to be [Spoerndle] , but I’m happier, I’m more at peace,” he says. “I’m extremely grateful I lived through it, grateful to be free. I believe I was allowed to live so I can help others.” Spoerndle currently devotes his time to volunteer work at 13 detox and rehab centers in the area, “helping people get out of that tortured place and have lives.”

Spoerndle’s lawsuit alleges that Phelps “knew that Michael Spoerndle was suffering from mental and physical problems which rendered him incapable and incompetent to han-dle his own affairs” and took advantage of this knowledge to “induce…Spoerndle to sign away his property and his right to control over the Toad’s Place business.”

Phelps and his lawyer, Gary Sklaver, declined to comment on the suit.

Molly Ball, Yale Herald Online; http://www.yaleherald.com/archive/xxx/2000.09.29/ae/p13toads.html

Unfortunately, I am unable to contact Mr. Spoerndle about his experiences, except perhaps by séance.  In this case, though years have passed since the suit was initiated, [circa year 2000].  Mr. Spoerndle was found dead in his East Haven House in 2011.  Brian McCready of the New Haven Register reported [Posted: 05/07/11, 12:00 AM EDT]:

NEW HAVEN — The man who made Connecticut rock has died. Mike Spoerndle, 59, of East Haven, who founded the legendary New Haven music club Toad’s Place in 1975 was found dead in his home Friday. The exact cause of death remains unknown…”  Brian McCready, New Haven Register http://www.nhregister.com/general-news/20110507/toads-place-founder-dies-brought-legends-to-new-haven-share-your-club-memories

A very sad day for New Haven Music, Arts and Entertainment, but most importantly, a link lost for my research.  I would have liked to compare notes, and gotten HIS opinion about Attorney Gary Sklaver, and the harassment he claimed to experience.

Not quite the Danny Casloaro story, but…? [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_Casolaro ]

Advertisement

WHO IS THE EGG-MAN?

Furthermore, Where Did I Leave That Walrus Anyway?

Draft four

When I head about the Snowden Situation, I immediately felt a sympathetic cord ring inside me.  Not so much to take a side for guilt or innocence, but a sympathetic feeling of someone who has felt the invisible presence of having my personal space penetrated.  I initially thought I would write-up this great paper about the Prism Project.  I remembered about a book I read about Sam Israel and Bayou Securities.  No—better idea still, Danny Casolaro’s story would make a stronger backbone.  Then the X-Keyscore story broke and I had to clear my desk.  Today I just learned about the SOD* program [*see end paragraph, Rachael Maddow, 8/5/2013].  Of course, if all else didn’t inspire me, I could always write about The Monarch Program.

This is the nebulous soup described in the movie ‘The Fog.’  What is it, what is out there?  I think the reason I can’t sketch out what I am feeling because the metaphor used to describe the NSA program locked me into a dull charcoal.  It isn’t specifically that vast quantities of data is being ‘vacuumed up.’   That may be part of what is going on, but I am teaching myself to not fall for the shell game.  Someone described the entire scope as a giant squid, reaching out and sticking to everything.  I prefer the simile of an octopus.  It sticks and rips away historically stuck data, AND it extends into many areas of our daily life.  And when the diver detective gets close, it spits out an inky blot so nothing can be seen clearly.

The results of the trip wire that Snowden walked through displayed itself when I read the NPR Snowden Wrap-up article.  I heard what he said when I watched the live Q & A, but NPR put it into permanent text.   This young man said, in a stray but intentional thought lurking in the conversation, that predictive analysis can be applied to each and any person.  By leveraging many technologies applied against hard database data, a type of virtual ESP blankets any point on the globe.  This is an arms race for control over people’s brains.  But are we looking through a lighted keyhole or is the door finally ajar?

The following is taken from the NPR website, displayed here without NPR’s permission to highlight the importance of this subtle point…

http://www.npr.org/2013/06/10/190398617/opinion-roundup-edward-snowden-and-the-nsa-leaks

 

GREENWALD: Why should people care about surveillance?

SNOWDEN: Because even if you’re not doing anything wrong, you’re being watched and recorded. And the storage capability of these systems increases every year consistently by orders of magnitude, to where it’s getting to the point you don’t have to have done anything wrong. You simply have to eventually fall under suspicion from somebody, even by a wrong call.

And then they can use this system to go back in time and scrutinize every decision you’ve ever made, every friend you’ve ever discussed something with, and attack you on that basis to sort to derive suspicion from an innocent life and paint anyone in the context of a wrongdoer


When the horror of having all thoughts, conversations, relationships and activities monitored; reality asks how should we now defend ourselves.  I tried to imagine this electronic fog-space.  Snowden has described some of the best protective pre-emptive devices for harvesting information.  But if civil liberty was reset, old-fashioned boots on the ground won’t replace the now uncovered electronic warrior sponges.  Citizens are being asked to tolerate the eavesdropping to phone, written word, electronic conversations, and possibly brain wave thoughts because there is no alternative.  The operators may be required to broadcast an ‘interference’ layer which makes the citizen or spy alike think they are listening to or tracking someone else.  Like layers of a gob-stopper candy, each layer that gets dissolved reveals another hard shell and a new flavor of surveillance.  [really sucks]

Most thoughts I have written about pertain to waking hours.  But what happens when the target goes to sleep.  Can I be subliminally whispered to in the first few minutes of twilight?  Can specific pieces of personal information be suggested to warp the brain’s dreamtime?  When you know there is a monster in the shadows, but have little light and no experiential foundation to visualize what you think you feel, the eyes and imagination WILL draw out something more horrific than past perceptions.  And perhaps, we are so far off the curve of acquired experience, our imaginations are correct.  Expert systems combined with The Prism project, X-Keyscore and the Monarch Program have already been revealed.  Imagine the coming attractions; bio-engineered clones will impersonate human life. [Watch Gattaca, 1997, or search wiki]  A Bluetooth device and a look-alike armed with a broadcasted constructed decision criteria profile could do this now in real-time.  Read the NPR Snowden interview transcript…

The Octopus seems to reach any place signals can create a dimensional atmosphere.  Politicians like Lindsey Graham appear to be in two places at on this topic .  The Prism Project seems a necessary part of modern data collection, but universal gun owner background checks appear to be too invasive. [Idea from MSNBC Rev Al Sharpton television show]  Another example is the insurance industry.  Prices are set and coverage is approved or denied.  Decisions are considered locked for fear of competitive reprisals.  The ‘carrot’ of privacy gets dangled in front of you eyes, but like the donkey, citizens are asked to just keep pulling that cart.  A final troubling situation arises when chosen individuals actually make a mistake or fail.  Forces move in to prevent disaster, and over time, failure is considered desirable.  Of course, the safety net won’t be there for regular people.  They are lured to replace the previous person’s disaster.  The magical enchantment encourages citizens to pay now, so another can repay an old debt.

I really set out to write about some of the spy vs. spy projects and devices.  I want to be sure I am factually accurate.  But I also have a sense that all of the revelations have not yet revealed themselves.  MY UNQUALIFIED GUT OPINION tells me the type of work Snowden performed for Booze Allen requires a back channel grey network to click back and forth in cases of data corruption.  This data corruption may originate from password hacking, packet theft, or ‘listening in’ to those who are listening in.  In order to separate the doppelgänger mirror image from the real operative, I WOULD GUESS in this type of scenario, one needs to step away from the shadow or reflection that one casts.  Who knows what authority is monitoring this grey network because the level of unknown about the front channel has become apparent through Edward’s revelations.  Who knows what happens to the data once it is acquired, reduced to text or storage, and sits on someone’s disk or desk.  Outdated versions of the tools could make their way into the secondary market.  One person’s junk is some unacquainted newbie’s treasure.

These tools still seem light years ahead of how the collective citizen mind is thinking.  If the bad guys use these tools, then the good guys should to, right?  I want to describe these tools as I see them.  They are the cane and spoon for the surveillance crowd.  I have a feeling they won’t live without them, now that they have been proven effective.  I just hope that someone will pass a law that protects my sleeping hours.  The one feeling that I know to be true is the longer I become acclimated to this new definition of privacy, the more time it seems I have already been living under its grip.  CAUTION:  Unconscious siphoning may have physical effects…

8/4/2013 [first draft]

Used without permission, Reuters News, John Schiffman…

http://news.yahoo.com/dea-program-differs-recent-nsa-revelations-091643827.html

*SOD: The SOD forwards tips gleaned from NSA intercepts, wiretaps by foreign governments, court-approved domestic wiretaps and a database called DICE to federal agents and local law enforcement officers. The DICE database is different from the NSA phone-records database. DICE consists of about 1 billion records, and is primarily a compilation of phone log data that is legally gathered by the DEA through subpoenas or search warrants

How Polluted is the Sonic Sea We Live In…

Written for Governor Dannel P. Malloy at the Manchester Community Forum, 4/4/2013, Manchester CT Lincoln Center…

-Draft-

NOISE POLLUTION

A:  Reflections off of Long Island Sound… May 1st 2013,  Gov. Dannel Malloy,  Norwalk Town Hall Meeting

Q: Thank you for letting me address you at this public town hall today. I believe that your presence in the governor’s chair is providing generally positive guidance for our State of Connecticut. Your previous job was in a metropolitan area, but much to my surprise you have adapted your style to match our state’s diversity. Your tree trimming policy was spot on, and your disaster leadership will form your legacy. Finally, Connecticut is small state, so every television appearance is critical for our standing on the Nation’s Stage.

My name is Anthony Maisano III, son of Anthony Maisano Jr., grandson of Anthony Maisano Sr. Three years ago, after my father’s passing, I was faced with some data confusion relating to our name similarities. For example, to this day I cannot get the CT DMV to get my license to match my birth certificate with a proper Suffix, rather than a numerical interpretation.

I have sent a few emails to your office relating to audible and understandable voice track blending over PAID media services, which I am current and subscribe to. Professionals call this a form of Electronic Harassment. Hackers could be making use of the Emergency Broadcasting Band because Home speakers, computer headphones, cell phone conversations, and radio streams are all tainted. The hacking seeps into my car, and yes, out-of-state as well. Your office has referred to this as Noise Pollution. Sometimes the hacked track commentary is more entertaining than the actual selection, but it is NOT invited.

I wish to publicly comment that when the additional polluted tracks affect my enjoyment of the paid media services I subscribe to, it might be time to take out the trash. Using your office’s analogy, the noise ‘trash pile’ may be growing OUTSIDE our houses, but no one deserves their living rooms polluted.

ARE YOU AWARE OF ANY OTHER COMPLAINTS RELATED TO THIS ISSUE?

ANTHONY MAISANO III
https://amaisano3.wordpress.com

This was the question I planned to ask Governor Malloy and LT. Governor Nancy Wyman, Thursday night, April 4th, 2013 at the Manchester Town Hall Meeting. Outside the time scope of my allowance, I did some extra research to try to decipher the ‘WHY’ of this irregular occurrence. I have developed two basic types of sound modification actions, In [through] the Box, and In the Path of My Ears.

Through the box implies that the sound track is being modified over the wire or FCC listed communication path, or inside the box I own and have chosen to receive a particular program or show. I have been able to record some of this sound alteration, with the addition of a ‘ch-ch-ch-ch-ch’ and / or a ‘be-e-e-e-ee-eeep’ sound set. This DOES seem to occur, but MAY be more illegal in the eyes of the law.

In the Path of My Ears seems to be the method of choice, although I would make the argument that when my ears are in MY house or MY car, the air-space is predominantly owned or controlled by me. Further, there would be no reasonable expectation on my part that this type of alteration SHOULD be occurring.

After talking to several people in the online community who have observed these phenomena, I utilized a ‘Full-Range All-Round Detector.’ It was calibrated to vibrate in the presence of frequency detection in the 1.2G, 2.4G, and 100MHZ to 3000MHZ wave patterns. It is not the most sophisticated device on the market, but did detect vectorized straight line wave streams, flowing through my house. I counted MANY of these interference rivers, some upstairs, some outside, some right through the listening path of my Television and Eardrums.

My thought is as sounds are emitted in a straight line, conical shape, towards My Ears, the waves must pass through at least 2 to 3 of these perpendicular streams. These streams are normally invisible to my eyes, traveling through my thin walls, in between endpoints unknown. Each stream has a defined top and bottom, as noticed when the detecting device is raised or lowered out of the path of the cross-cutting stream.  As the correct broadcast sound travels toward my ears, it becomes ‘tainted’ or ‘polluted’ with ‘sticky data that is part of the cross-cutting stream.’ This cross-cutting stream ‘modifies’ the intended broadcast. My body is sitting at a point furthest away from the television, and further away from the cross-cutting streams. The co-mingled sound broadcast eventually reaches my ears, conveying a different message than was initially intended at the studio or origination site. Noise pollution or harassment, these changes are unwarranted AND unwelcome.

The scientific experiment was necessary to prove the existence of the sound co-mingled changes, and not to inspire the listener into thinking my ears or brain was broken or damaged. Further, the laser-light camera sensor defined a pinpoint midway between the top and bottom of the television tube, which I will define as a horizon line. From hour to hour, the pinpoint slides left and right, but always remain on axis. When the device is directed to shine at a wall or window, a larger ‘flash light’ beam appears, just like a normal flash light ‘large circular spot.’

The pinpoint on the television screen shall be a discussion for a different day. My hope is to first clean up the Sound Pollution Trash Pile.